مهندسی ساخت و تولید ایران

مهندسی ساخت و تولید ایران

ارزیابی خواص مکانیکی ورق‌های هایلایت (آلومینیوم AA5182/پلی‌پروپیلن/آلومینیوم AA5182) و آلومینیوم یکپارچه AA5052

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
دانشکده مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه صنعتی نوشیروانی بابل، بابل، ایران
10.22034/ijme.2026.571325.2160
چکیده
ورق‌های آلومینیومی هایلایت، از ترکیب لایه‌های آلومینیومی و هسته پلیمری ساخته می‌شوند و معمولاً با نام ورق‌های کامپوزیت آلومینیوم شناخته می‌شوند. این ورق‌ها از دو لایه نازک آلومینیوم در طرفین تشکیل شده‌اند که میان آن‌ها یک هسته پلیمری قرار دارد. ترکیب این ساختار چندلایه سبب می‌شود ورق در عین سبکی، استحکام بالا، مقاومت مناسب در برابر ضربه و قابلیت شکل‌دهی عالی داشته باشد. این مطالعه، یک تحلیل تجربی جامع از خواص مکانیکی ورق آلومینیوم AA5182 ساندویچی هایلایت با هسته پلی‌پروپیلن در مقایسه با ورق یکپارچه آلومینیوم AA5052 ارائه داده است. بدین منظور، تست‌های مکانیکی شامل کشش تک‌محوره، برش درون‌صفحه، کشش شکاف‌دار و کشش کرنش‌صفحه‌ای برای ارزیابی عملکرد در هر دو حالت انجام شد. نتایج نشان داد که ورق‌های هایلایت در شرایط برش درون‌صفحه تنها 6/19 % کاهش در ظرفیت باربری نشان دادند، در حالی که در شرایط کرنش‌صفحه‌ای این کاهش به 1/55 % رسید. مشاهدات شکست نشان داد که هایلایت در شرایط تمرکز تنش (مانند کشش شکاف‌دار) به جای شکست شکل‌پذیر، با شکست برشی در زاویه ۴۵ درجه و جدایش بین‌لایه‌ای گسیخته می‌شود که منجر به جذب انرژی به مراتب کمتر نسبت به آلومینیوم یکپارچه می‌شود. همچنین مقایسه نتایج حاضر با مطالعات پیشین نشان می‌دهد که افزایش ضخامت لایه‌های فلزی رویه و کاهش ضخامت هسته پلیمری می‌تواند عملکرد مکانیکی این گونه ساندویچ‌ها را به طور محسوسی بهبود بخشد. اگرچه کاهش قابل‌توجهی در حداکثر ظرفیت بار (1/55 %) و انرژی جذب ‌شده (8/74 %) برای ورق‌های هایلایت نسبت به آلومینیوم یکپارچه مشاهده شد، با این وجود ساختار ساندویچی به دلیل وزن کمتر (حدود 40 %) و سفتی اولیه بالاتر در کشش، دارای نسبت عملکرد به وزن مطلوب‌تری می باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Comparative mechanical characterization assessment of Aluminium AA5182/ Polypropylene/ Aluminium AA5182 Hylite sheets and monolithic Aluminum AA5052

نویسندگان English

Ahmed Qasim Alrubaye
Mohammad Javad Mirnia
Majid Elyasi
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
چکیده English

Hylite aluminum sheets are constructed from a combination of aluminum layers and a polymer core, commonly known as aluminum composite panels. These sheets consist of two thin aluminum layers on the outside, with a polymer core sandwiched in between. This multilayer composite structure imparts the sheets with characteristics such as lightness, high strength, appropriate impact resistance, and excellent formability. This study provides a comprehensive experimental analysis of the mechanical properties of AA5182 aluminum Hylite sandwich sheets with a polypropylene core, in comparison to monolithic AA5052 aluminum sheets. For this purpose, mechanical tests including uniaxial tension, in-plane shear, notched tension, and plane strain tension were conducted to evaluate performance in both conditions. The results indicated that Hylite sheets exhibited only a 19.6% reduction in load-bearing capacity under in-plane shear conditions, while under plane strain conditions this reduction reached 55.1%. Fracture observations revealed that under stress concentration conditions (such as notched tension), Hylite sheets fail through shear failure at a 45-degree angle and interlayer separation, rather than ductile fracture, leading to significantly lower energy absorption compared to monolithic aluminum. Furthermore, a comparison of the present results with previous studies shows that increasing the thickness of the outer metal layers and reducing the thickness of the polymer core can noticeably enhance the mechanical performance of such sandwich structures. Although a significant reduction in maximum load capacity (55.1%) and absorbed energy (74.8%) was observed for the Hylite sheets compared to monolithic aluminum, the sandwich structure nevertheless exhibits a more favorable performance-to-weight ratio due to its lower weight (approximately 40%) and higher initial stiffness in tension.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hylite
Aluminum-Polypropylene
Metal/Polymer/Metal (MPM)
Sandwich Panel
Lightweight Materials
Mechanical Properties
[1] Askarian Khoob A, Ramezani MJ, Mousavi SS. Low-Velocity impact resistance of glass laminate aluminium reinforced epoxy (GLARE) composite. Recent Progress in Materials. 2023 May;5(2):1-26. doi: 10.21926/rpm.2302021
[2] Harhash M, Sokolova O, Carradó A, Palkowski H. Mechanical properties and forming behaviour of laminated steel/polymer sandwich systems with local inlays–Part 1. Composite Structures. 2014 Dec 1;118:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.011
[3] Chandel R, Sharma N, Bansal SA. A review on recent developments of aluminum-based hybrid composites for automotive applications. Emergent Materials. 2021 Oct;4(5):1243-57. doi: 10.1007/s42247-021-00186-6
[4] Palomba G, Epasto G, Crupi V. Lightweight sandwich structures for marine applications: a review. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 2022 Oct 26;29(26):4839-64. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1941448
[5] Harms V, Harhash M, Carrado A, Palkowski H. Energy Absorption Behavior of Metal/Polymer/Metal Sandwich Crash Structures. Key Engineering Materials. 2017 Aug 17;746:275-81. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.746.275
[6] Christke S, Gibson AG, Grigoriou K, Mouritz AP. Multi-layer polymer metal laminates for the fire protection of lightweight structures. Materials & Design. 2016 May 5;97:349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.105
[7] Naik RK, Das AK, Mahale PR, Panda SK, Racherla V. Design optimization of high interface strength metal–polymer–metal sandwich panels. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2023 Aug 1;171:107544. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107544
[8] Carradò A, Ravindra NM. Metal/Polymer/Metal Sandwich Systems: An Overview: Carradò and Ravindra. JOM. 2023 Dec;75(12):5126-40. doi: 10.1007/s11837-023-06207-5
[9] Forcellese A, Simoncini M. Mechanical properties and formability of metal–polymer–metal sandwich composites. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2020 Apr;107(7):3333-49. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-05245-6
[10] Hufenbach W, Jaschinski J, Weber T, Weck D. Numerical and experimental investigations on HYLITE sandwich sheets as an alternative sheet metal. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2008 Jun;8(2):67-80. doi: 10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60194-0
[11] Jackson KP, Allwood JM, Landert M. Incremental forming of sandwich panels. Journal of materials processing technology. 2008 Aug 11;204(1-3):290-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.117
[12] Carradò A, Faerber J, Niemeyer S, Ziegmann G, Palkowski H. Metal/polymer/metal hybrid systems: Towards potential formability applications. Composite Structures. 2011 Jan 1;93(2):715-21. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.07.016
[13] Santiago R, Cantwell W, Alves M. Impact on thermoplastic fibre-metal laminates: Experimental observations. Composite structures. 2017 Jan 1;159:800-17. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.011
[14] Khardin M, Harhash M, Chernikov D, Glushchenkov V, Palkowski H. Preliminary studies on electromagnetic forming of aluminum/polymer/aluminum sandwich sheets. Composite Structures. 2020 Nov 15;252:112729. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112729
[15] Harhash M, Kuhtz M, Richter J, Hornig A, Gude M, Palkowski H. Influence of adhesion properties on the crash behavior of steel/polymer/steel sandwich crashboxes: An experimental study. Metals. 2021 Sep 4;11(9):1400. doi: 10.3390/met11091400
[16] Khani S, Harhash M, Palkowski H, Buhl J. Incremental Sheet Forming on Tailored Hybrid Steel/Polymer/Steel Sandwich Materials; Formability and Residual Stress Investigation: Khani, Harhash, Palkowski, and Buhl. JOM. 2025 Oct;77(10):7505-18. doi: 10.1007/s11837-025-07486-w
[17] Beyranvand R, Ansari M, Deilami Azodi H, Jafari MM. Effect of drilling parameters on fiber delamination, surface quality, and drilling force in curved luminum/Glass/Polypropylene composite. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2025 Sep 23;12(7):81-95. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2025.543487.2126 [In Persian]
[18] Vahidi H, Gerami A, Ahmadi H, Liaghat, GH. Behavior of sandwich panels with expanded cork agglomerate cores under quasi-Static indentation and three-point bending. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2025 June 1;12(4):16-27. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2025.507790.2050 [In Persian]
[19] Nassiri A, Atrian A. Investigation of the energy absorption in three-layer Al/Polypropylene/Steel deep drawn cups. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2020 Aug 22;7(6):34-43. [In Persian]
[20] Askari M, Javadi   M, Eslami Farsani R, Geranmayeh A. The assessment of energy absorption capability of aluminum/epoxy-glass fibers laminates after exposer to the thermal cycling. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2022 May;9(2):30-40. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2022.157560 [In Persian]
[21] Rezayat HR, Toozandehjani H, Zakeri A. Investigating the energy absorption of sandwich panel with aluminum core and skin under Quasi-static loading: A numerical and experimental study. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2024 March;11(1):61-75. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2024.434159.1900  [In Persian]
[22] Zal V, Talebi-Ghadikolaee H, Mirzamohammadi S. Investigating the effect of polyurethane foam filling on the energy absorption of hybrid tubes with different thickness of composite layer. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2024 April;11(2):58-68. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2024.433178.1893 [In Persian]
[23] Naderli R, Soltanpour M, Asadi P. Experimental investigation of the joinability of three-layer aluminum/ polymer/ aluminum composite sheets by the clinching process. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2021 June;8(4):27-38. [In Persian]
[24] Abdollahi Azghan M, Asghari Arpatappeh F, Eslami-Farsani R. Experimental study of the effect of cryogenic cycling and metal surface treatment on flexural properties of aluminum-epoxy/basalt fibers laminate composite. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2017 Sep 22;4(1):15-24. [In Persian]
[25] Moridi K, Mirnia   MJ, Elyasi M. Experimental investigation of AA6061 sheet metal deformation strategy for flange edge forming using single point incremental forming process. Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. 2024 August;11(6):66-77. doi: 10.22034/ijme.2024.465287.1979 [In Persian]
[26] 3A Composites. Hylite – Aluminium Composite Sheets. 3A Composites; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul]. Available from: https://www.3acomposites.com/en/products/hylite/
[27] Mirnia MJ, Shamsari M. Numerical prediction of failure in single point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2017 Jun 1;244:17-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.029