[1] Zhang Y, Y. Li, Guo k, Zhu L. Dynamic mechanical behaviour and energy absorption of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under repeated impact loads. Ocean Engineering. 2020 Nov 1;219:108344.
doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108344
[2] Zarei Mahmoudabadi M, Sadighi M. Experimental investigation on the energy absorption characteristics of honeycomb sandwich panels under quasi-static punch loading:
Aerospace Science and Technology. 2019 Feb 23;88:273–86.
doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.035
[3] Khaire N, Tiwari G, Patel V, Iqbal M. Assessment of the ballistic response of honeycomb sandwich structures subjected to offset and normal impact.
Defence Technology. 2022 Dec 27.
doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2022.12.018
[4] Tariq F, Uzair M, Shifa M, Residual compressive strength of aluminum alloy honeycomb sandwich panel in the presence of multiple impact dents.J.
Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2021 Aug 1;24:1189–205.
doi: 10.1177/10996362211036987
[5] Sun G, Chen D, Wang H, Hazell P, Li Q. High-velocity impact behaviour of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels with different structural configurations.
International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2018 Aug 13; 122:119–36.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.007
[6] Zhang Y, Yan L, Zhang C, Guo S. Low-velocity impact response of tube-reinforced honeycomb sandwich structure.
Thin-Walled Structures. 2020 Sept 20;158:107188.
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107188
[7] Petras A, Sutcliffe M. Failure mode maps for honeycomb sandwich panels. Composite Structures. 1999 Jul 6;44:237–52.
doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8
[8] Foo C, Seah L, Chai G. Low-velocity impact failure of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels. Composite Structures. 2007 Oct 17;85:20–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.10.016
[9] Crupi V, Epasto G, Guglielmino E. Collapse modes in aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels under bending and impact loading.
International Journal of Impact Engineering.: 2011 Dec 16;43:6–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.002
[10] Zhang X, Xu F, Zang Y, Feng W. Experimental and numerical investigation on damage behavior of honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to low-velocity impact. Composite Structures. 2020 Jan 3;236:111882
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111882
[12] Sun G, Huo X, Wang H, On the structural parameters of honeycomb-core sandwich panels against low-velocity impact, Composites. Part B Engineering. 2021 Apr 5;216:108881.
doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108881
[13] Hassanpour F, Liaghat G, Sabouri H, Experimental investigation of quasistatic penetration tests on honeycomb sandwich panels filled with polymer foam. Mechanics of advanced materials and Structures. 2018 Sept 14;27:1803-15.
doi: 10.1080/15376494.2018.1525628
[14] Ricardo J, Rocha B, Marcelo F. S, edgewise compression and three- point bending analysis of repaired composite sandwich panel. MPDI Material Journal. 2023 Jun 5;16:4249.
doi: 10.3390/ma16124249
[15] Military standard Sandwich Constructions and core materials, MIL-STD-410B, General test method, Department of Defens, Washington, D.C. 1967.
[16] Military standard adhesive film form Sandwich Constructions, MIL-A-25463.Department of Defens,Washington, D.C.1982.
[17] Shengqing Z and Boay C. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact. Composite Structures; 2013 Feb 26;101:204–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010
[18] Rahimijonoush A, Bayat M. Experimental and numerical studies on the ballistic impact response of titanium sandwich panels with different facesheets thickness ratios. Thin-Walled Structures: 2020 Aug 21;157:107079
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107079
