[1] Dohmann F, Hartl C. Tube hydroforming—research and practical application. Journal of Materials Processing Technology: 1997; 71(1): 174-186.
doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00166-0
[2] Korkolis I. Formability and hydroforming of anisotropic aluminum tubes [dissertation]. University of Texas. 2009.
[3] Lang L, Wang Z, Kang D, Yuan S, Zhang S-H, Danckert J. Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology: 2004; 151 (1-3): 165-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032
[4] Ahmetoglu M, Sutter K, Li X, Altan T. Tube hydroforming: current research, applications and need for training. Journal of Materials Processing Technology: 2000; 98 (2): 224-31.
doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00203-4
[5] Ahmetoglu M, Altan T. Tube hydroforming: state-of-the-art and future trends. Journal of Materials Processing Technology: 2000; 98 (1): 25-33.
doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00302-7
[6] Faupel J H. Yield and bursting characteristics of heavy wall cylinders. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers: 1956; 78(5):1031-1064.
doi: 10.1115/1.4013916
[7] Dietmann H. The flow behavior of thick-walled cylinders under internal pressure, Bander Blech Rohre. 1967; 8 (3): 143-149. [In German]
[8] Fuchs F J. Hydrostatic pressure its role in metal forming. Mechanical Engineering: 1966; 88(4), pp. 34-40.
[9] Al-Qureshi H A. Comparison between the bulging of thin-walled tubes using rubber forming technique and hydraulic forming process. Sheet Metal Industries: 1970; 47: 607-612.
[10] Sauer W J. Gotera A, Robb F, Huang P. Free bulge forming of tubes under internal pressure and axial compression. in: Proceedings of the Sixth NAMRC: 1978: 228-235.
[11] Fuchizawa S. Infuence of strain hardening exponent on the deformation of thin-walled tube of finite length subjected to hydrostatic external pressure. Advanced Technology of Plasticity: 1984; 1: 297-302.
[12] Hashimi M S J, Crampton R. Hydraulic bulge forming of axisymmetric and asymmetric components: comparison of experimental results and theoretical predictions. in: Proceedings of the International MTDR Conference: 1985: 541-549.
[14] Seyedkashi S M H, Moslemi N H, Liaghat Gh, Mosavi M M, Shojaee K, Mirzaali M, Moon Y H. Experimental and numerical investigation of an adaptive simulated annealing technique in optimization of warm tube hydroforming. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture: 2012; 226(11): 1869-1879.
doi: 10.1177/0954405412459611
[15] Hashemi R, Assempour A, Abad E M K. Implementation of the forming limit stress diagram to obtain suitable load path in tube hydroforming considering M–K model. Materials & Design: 2009; 30:3545-53.
[16] Liewald M. Magnesium Tube Hydroforming. 10th ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming. Zaragoza, Spain2007.
[17] Liewald M. Magnesium tube hydroforming. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik: Entwicklung: 2008; 39:4-5.
doi: 10.1002/mawe.200800303
[18] He Z-b, Liu G, Wu J, Yuan S-j, Liang Y-c. Mechanical property and formability of AZ31B extruded tube at elevated temperature. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China: 2008;18: 209-213.
doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60204-X
[19] He Z, Yuan S, Liu G, Wu J, Cha W. Formability testing of AZ31B magnesium alloy tube at elevated temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology: 2010; 210: 877-884.
[20] Lin Y-l, He Z-b, Yuan S-j, Wu J. Formability determination of AZ31B tube for IHPF process at elevated temperature. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China: 2011; 21: 851-856.
doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60792-9
[21] Kadkhodayan M, Moghadam A E. Optimization of load paths in X-and Y-shaped hydroforming. International Journal of Material Forming: 2013; 6: 75-91.
doi: 10.1007/s12289-011-1074-3
[22] Liu G, Peng J, Yuan S, Teng B, Li K. Analysis on critical conditions of sidewall wrinkling for hydroforming of thin-walled Tee-joint. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture: 2015; 97: 42-49.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.06.004
[23] Cui X L, Yuan S. Analysis of thickness variation and stress state in hydroforming of complex T-shaped tubular part of nickel-based superalloy. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering: 2021; 21: 1-14.
doi: 10.1007/s43452-021-00263-x
[24] Chen M, Xiao X, Tong J, Guo H, Wen J. Optimization of loading path in hydroforming of parallel double branched tube through response surface methodology. Advances in Engineering Software: 2018; 115: 429-438.
doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.11.003
)