Investigation of dynamic absorber parameters to improve the vibration behavior of boring bar

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Faculty of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the boring process with length to diameter ratio more than four, due to low rigidity of the tool, a lot of vibration is caused and the machining quality of the surface is reduced. For this reason, controlling and reducing vibration of the tool is always important. In this paper, the lateral vibration of a long boring bar equipped with dynamic absorber and the effect of various parameters are investigated. For this purpose, first the governing equations of the system are extracted and solved using assumed mode method. Then, the effect of absorber presence and its parameters such as absorber position, absorber stiffness and absorber length on the vibration of tool are studied and results are presented in diagrams. The results show that the addition of absorber increases the natural frequency of tool by 10% and as the absorber gets closer to the tip, the performance of boring process increases. Also, as the stiffness of the absorber increases, the steady-state cutting range of the boring bar increases and the tool begins to vibrate at higher frequencies. In addition, by increasing absorber length up to 175 mm, the distance between the two absorber resonance frequencies increases, which indicates an increase in the range of stable cutting and dynamic stiffness, and also from lengths greater than 175 mm, this behavior decreases.

Keywords

References

[1] M. Siddhpura and R. Paurobally, “A review of chatter vibration research in turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol. 61, pp. 27–47, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.05.007.
[2] W. Hendrowati, H. L. Guntur, A. A. A. Daman, and H. Lestari, “Analytical and experimental study of translational vibration response’s reduction on aluminum (Al) drilling process using translational mass vibration absorber (TMVA) system,” AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 2187, 2019, doi: 10.1063/1.5138353.
[3] E. Budak and E. Ozturk, “Dynamics and stability of parallel turning operations,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 383–386, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.028.
[4] D. I. Suyama, A. E. Diniz, and R. Pederiva, “The use of carbide and particle-damped bars to increase tool overhang in the internal turning of hardened steel,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol. 86, No. 5–8, pp. 2083–2092, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-8328-z.
[5] F. Xia, Z. Liu, and Q. Song, “Boring bar with constrained damping,” Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin., Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2652–2659, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0484.
[6] M. Sortino, G. Totis, and F. Prosperi, “Development of a practical model for selection of stable tooling system configurations in internal turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol. 61, pp. 58–70, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.05.010.
[7] L. T. Tunç and E. Budak, “Effect of cutting conditions and tool geometry on process damping in machining,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol. 57, pp. 10–19, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.01.009.
[8] X. Lei and C. Wu, “Investigating the Optimal Damping Performance of a Composite Dynamic Vibration Absorber with Particle Damping,” J. Vib. Eng. Technol., Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 503–511, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s42417-018-0067-7.
[9] L. Houck, T. L. Schmitz, and K. Scott Smith, “A tuned holder for increased boring bar dynamic stiffness,” J. Manuf. Process., Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 24–29, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2010.09.002.
[10] X. Liu, Q. Liu, S. Wu, R. Li, and H. Gao, “Analysis of the vibration characteristics and adjustment method of boring bar with a variable stiffness vibration absorber,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Vol. 98, No. 1–4, pp. 95–105, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0453-4.
[11] L. Rubio, J. A. Loya, M. H. Miguélez, and J. Fernández-Sáez, “Optimization of passive vibration absorbers to reduce chatter in boring,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., Vol. 41, No. 1–2, pp. 691–704, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.07.019.
[12] L. Li, B. Sun, and H. Hua, “Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of a Boring Bar with a Variable Stiffness Dynamic Vibration Absorber,” Shock Vib., Vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/5284194.
[13] U. Yigit, E. Cigeroglu, and E. Budak, “Chatter reduction in boring process by using piezoelectric shunt damping with experimental verification,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., Vol. 94, pp. 312–321, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.02.044.
[14] E. Abele, M. Haydn, and T. Grosch, “Adaptronic approach for modular long projecting boring tools,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., Vol. 65, No. 1, pp. 393–396, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.104.
[15] Y. Alammari, M. Sanati, T. Freiheit, and S. S. Park, “Investigation of Boring Bar Dynamics for Chatter Suppression,” Procedia Manuf., Vol. 1, pp. 768–778, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.059.
[16] F. Chen, M. Hanifzadegan, Y. Altintas, and X. Lu, “Active damping of boring bar vibration with a magnetic actuator,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 2783–2794, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2015.2393364.
[17] A. Matsubara, M. Maeda, and I. Yamaji, “Vibration suppression of boring bar by piezoelectric actuators and LR circuit,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 373–376, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.03.132.
[18] J. Lü, J. Niu, Y. Shen, and S. Yang, “Vibration control of linear boring bar by dynamic vibration absorber combined with nonlinear energy sink,” Lixue Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Vol. 53, No. 11, pp. 3124–3133, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-475.
[19] A. Patel, A. Yadav, M. Law, B. Bhattacharya, and P. Wahi, “Damped Chatter Resistant Boring Bar Integrated with an Absorber Working in Conjunction with an Eddy Current Damper,” Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s42417-022-00684-9.
[20] F. Bakhtiari-Nejad and H. Moradi, “Optimum design of vibration absorber with variable position for an Euler-Bernoulli beam under moving point excitation,” 14th Int. Congr. Sound Vib. 2007, ICSV 2007, Vol. 2, pp. 1058–1065, 2007.
Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering
Volume 9, Issue 7
October 2022
Pages 1-8

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics