Iranian Journal of  Manufacturing Engineering

Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering

Behavior of sandwich panels with expanded cork agglomerate cores under quasi-Static indentation and three-point bending

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This research experimentally investigates the mechanical behavior of innovative sandwich panels with expanded cork agglomerate cores under quasi-static indentation and three-point bending tests. Two types of cork cores, including dry cork (SPDC3) and cork with rubber particles (SPC3), were used in a monolithic configuration, while a layered core configuration (LSPC1) consisting of alternating layers of cork with rubber particles and glass fiber/epoxy composite was also examined. The face sheets of all sandwich panels were made of glass fiber/epoxy composite with a 0/90 layup. A reference specimen, an 8-layer glass fiber/epoxy composite plate (GE8), was also tested for comparison. The indentation test results showed that the SPDC3 sample exhibited the highest energy absorption due to the core crushing mechanism, whereas the presence of rubber particles had a negative effect on both indentation resistance and energy absorption under quasi-static loading. In the bending test, the GE8 sample demonstrated the highest flexural strength but failed in a brittle manner. In contrast, the SPDC3 sample, despite having lower flexural strength than GE8, exhibited significantly higher energy absorption (16.5 J compared to 9.43 J) due to the core crushing mechanism. The LSPC1 sample, while having lower flexural strength than SPDC3, showed the highest ultimate displacement (31.9 mm) and recovered to its original shape after unloading, indicating a unique ductility. Damage analysis revealed different failure mechanisms, including brittle fiber failure in GE8, delamination in LSPC1, and core crushing in SPDC3 and SPC3. Although the reference sample (GE8) showed higher flexural strength, the sandwich panels with expanded cork agglomerate cores, especially those with dry cork, demonstrated considerable potential in applications requiring high energy absorption and a more ductile behavior under quasi-static loading, highlighting the high potential of these novel materials as a suitable alternative to traditional structures.
Keywords

[1] Steeves CA, Fleck NA. Material selection in sandwich beam construction. Scripta materialia. 2004 May 1;50(10):1335-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.015
[2] Allen HG. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels: the commonwealth and international library: structures and solid body mechanics division. Elsevier; 2013 Oct 22. doi: 10.1016/C2013-0-02134-2
[3] Zenkert D. The handbook of sandwich construction. Engineering Materials Advisory Services; 1997.
[4] Moreira RA, De Melo FJ, Dias Rodrigues JF. Static and dynamic characterization of composition cork for sandwich beam cores. Journal of Materials Science. 2010 Jun;45(12):3350-66. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4356-0
[5] Gameiro CP, Cirne J, Gary G. Experimental study of the quasi-static and dynamic behaviour of cork under compressive loading. Journal of Materials Science. 2007 Jun;42(12):4316-24. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0675-6
[6] Reis L, Silva A. Mechanical behavior of sandwich structures using natural cork agglomerates as core materials. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2009 Nov;11(6):487-500. doi: 10.1177/1099636209104523
[7] Kim S, Wallace D, editors. Designing and testing of cork composite core material. In: 9th International Conference on Sandwich Structures; 2010.
[8] Silva JM, Devezas TC, Silva A, Gil L, Nunes C, Franco N. Exploring the use of cork based composites for aerospace applications. InMaterials Science Forum 2010 Mar 10 (Vol. 636, pp. 260-265). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.260
[9] Pereira H. Cork: biology, production and uses. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52967-1.X5000-6
[10] Sergi C, Sarasini F, Tirillò J. The compressive behavior and crashworthiness of cork: A review. Polymers. 2021 Dec 30;14(1):134. doi: 10.3390/polym14010134
[11] Castro O, Silva JM, Devezas T, Silva A, Gil L. Cork agglomerates as an ideal core material in lightweight structures. Materials & Design. 2010 Jan 1;31(1):425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.039
[12] Liu CX, Fu ZY, Li P, Qi G. Bending and environmental characteristics of an eco-friendly sandwich panel with cork stopper cores. Developments in the Built Environment. 2023 Oct 1;15:100206. doi: 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100206
[13] Hachemane B, Zitoune R, Bezzazi B, Bouvet C. Sandwich composites impact and indentation behaviour study. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2013 Aug 1;51:1-0. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.014
[14] Sutherland LS, Soares CG. Impact resistance of cork-skinned marine PVC/GRP sandwich laminates. Thin-Walled Structures. 2022 Nov 1;180:109830. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.109830
[15] Lakreb N, Bezzazi B, Pereira H. Mechanical strength properties of innovative sandwich panels with expanded cork agglomerates. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 2015 Jul;73(4):465-73. doi: 10.1007/s00107-015-0908-y
[16] Fernandes FA, Tavares JP, de Sousa RA, Pereira AB, Esteves JL. Manufacturing and testing composites based on natural materials. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017 Jan 1;13:227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.055
[17] Nóvoa PJ, Arteiro AJ, Marques AT. Modified expanded cork core sandwich structure with improved performance. InProceedings of the ECCM 2018 Jun.
[18] Correia JM, Serra GF, Alves de Sousa RJ, Pereira AB, Fernandes FA. Expanded (Black) cork for the development of an eco-friendly surfboard: environmental impact and mechanical properties. Sustainability. 2022 Jan 7;14(2):668. doi: 10.3390/su14020668