Iranian Journal of  Manufacturing Engineering

Iranian Journal of Manufacturing Engineering

Analysis and investigation of the characteristics of the flow and the force on the poppet including the edge of the flow deviation in the hydraulic check valve

Document Type : Original Article

Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jundi Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, Iran
Abstract
The movement of the poppet in the structure of hydraulic check valves is accompanied by vibration under the influence of oil pressure. In this article, to reduce vibration and wear in check valves, a poppet including the edge of the flow deviation is used. Therefore, to evaluate the performance of this sample check valves, the effect of oil pressure, displacement, and length of the flow deflection edge, on some dependent quantities, was investigated numerically and experimentally. Various evaluations showed that in all working conditions, the results of measurement of physical quantities have a difference of less than 5% from the results of numerical analysis. Further investigations showed that the creation of 2, 4, and 6 mm flow deflection edges in the end part of the poppet used in the internal structure of the hydraulic check valve, increases the axial force by 2.3, 18.1, and 22.9 percent, respectively. While the creation of the edge of the flow deviation poppet reduces the discharge coefficient of the valve by 1.57%. Also, creating a curve of 4 mm in the inlet port of the valve increases the axial force on the moving poppet by 14.2%. In addition, the increase in displacement of the poppet, while increasing the force on it, increased the force coefficient and the discharge coefficient of the valve. Also, in different valve displacements, the discharge coefficient of a check valve including a valve without a flow deviation edge is higher than the discharge coefficient of a valve including a valve with a flow deviation edge.
Keywords

[1] Li R, Sun Y, Wu X, Zhang P, Li D, Lin J, Xia Y, Sun Q. Review of the research on and optimization of the flow force of hydraulic spool valves. Processes. 2023 July 21;11(7):2183. doi: 10.3390/pr11072183
[2] Filo G, Lisowski E, Rajda J. Pressure loss reduction in an innovative directional poppet control valve. Energies. 2020 June 17;13(12). doi: 10.3390/en13123149
[3] Liu J, Li R, Diang X, Liu Q. Flow force research and structure improvement of cartridge valve core based on CFD method. Heliyon. 2022 November 11;8(11):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon. 2022.e11700
[4] Jin Z, Hong W, You T, Su Y, Li X, Xie F. Effect of multi-factor coupling on the movement characteristics of the hydraulic variable valve actuation. Energies. 2020 June 4;13(11):2870. doi: 10.3390/en13112870

[5] Scuro N, Angelo E, Angelo G, Andrade D. A CFD analysis of the flow dynamics of a directly-operated safety relief valve. Nuclear Engineering, and Design. 2020 June 4;328:321-32. doi: 10.3390/en13112870

[6] Gomez I, Gonzalez A, Newell B, Garcia-Bravo J. Analysis of the design of a poppet valve by transitory simulation. Energies. 2019 March 20;12(5):889-907. doi: 10.3390/en12050889
[7] Finesso R, Rundo M. Numerical and experimental investigation on a conical poppet relief valve with flow force compensation. International Journal of Fluid Power. 2017 February 15;18(2):111-22. doi: 10.1080/14399776.2017.1296740
[8] Woldemariam E, Lemu H, Wang G. CFD-driven valve shape optimization for performance improvement of a micro cross-flow turbine. Energies. 2018 January 19;11(1):248. doi: 10.3390/en11010248
[9] Chen F, Qian J, Chen M, Zhang M, Chen L, Jin Z. Turbulent compressible flow analysis on multi-stage high pressure reducing valve. Flow Measurement, and Instrumentation. 2018 June 2;61:26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.03.013

[10] Filo G, Lisowski E, Rajda J. Flow analysis of a switching valve with innovative poppet head geometry using CFD method. Flow Measurement and Instruction. 2019 December 2;70. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.101643

 [11] Ye J, Zhao Z, Zheng J, Salem S, Yu J, Cui J, Jiao X. Transient flow characteristic of high-pressure hydrogen Gas in check valve during the opening process. Energies. 2020 August 14;13(16):4222. doi: 10.3390/en13164222

[12] Wang H, Zhu Z, Zhang M, Li J, Huo W. Investigation on cavitating flow and parameter effects in a control valve with a perforated cage. Nuclear Engineering, and Technology. 2021 August 21;53(8):2669-81. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2021.02.003

[13] Zhao R, Lian Z, Liao Y. Design and experimental study of water hydraulic valve port based on flow force. Machine Tool and Hydraulics. 2022 December 14;50(1):1–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2022.01.001
[14] Zhang Z, Su Q, Li H, Fang F. Optimized design of diversion structure for low hydraulic valve core of proportional servo valve. Flight Control Detect. 2022 July 21;5(1):8–15. doi: 10.3390/pr05012183
[15] Schickhofer L, Wimmer J. Fluid–structure interaction and dynamic stability of shock absorber check valves. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2022 March 9;110:103536. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103536
[16] Wang D, Yin Y, Fu J, Jian H. Effect of the balanced piston on the stability of hydraulic pilot-operated relief valve. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 2023 January 9;237(2):321-34. doi: 10.1177/09544062221122021
[17] Yin Y, Wang D, Fu J, Jian H. Effect of Dynamic Pressure Feedback Orifice on Stability of Cartridge-Type Hydraulic Pilot-Operated Relief Valve. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2023 August 8;36:1-15. doi: 10.1186/s10033-023-00922-5